Brave. Dir. Mark Andrews, Brenda Chapman, and Steve
Purcell. Disney-Pixar, 2012. DVD.
93 mins.
Reviewed by Leila K. Norako (lknorako@gmail.com)
Brave — Pixar’s
first period film — garnered wide acclaim upon its release in June, 2012. It
won both an Academy Award and a BAFTA award for best animated film and was
nominated for ten Annie awards (it won for production design and animated
effects). Set in medieval Scotland, it tells the story of a headstrong
princess, Merida, and her mother, Queen Elinor, and how the two find common
ground through a difficult (and supernatural) adventure. Brenda Chapman, one of
Pixar’s directors, pitched the initial idea for the story, having been inspired
by her “feisty” and “opinionated” six-year-old daughter [1].
The goal, however, was to create a folktale that would appeal to both girls and
boys (hence the ambiguous title [2]).
And, given the shared Scottish heritage of the co-directors (Chapman and Mark
Andrews), the team decided to set their folktale in that land’s distant and
mythical past.
The film has been praised for its stunning animation, its
strong, female heroine, and its portrayal of a mother and daughter’s
relationship. Brave’s numerous and
overlapping anachronisms, however, have been a regular topic of discussion
among medievalists [3]. They are certainly
abundant, but the creators clearly sought to present a fantasy version of
medieval Scotland rooted in our contemporary imagination rather than an
historically faithful portrait. Moreover, there remains something decidedly
medieval about the way in which these anachronisms and mismatched historical
details overlap to form strange, but ultimately purposeful, collages. In this
way, Brave introduces medieval
narrative methodologies to its audience through its various anachronisms and
temporal overlaps.
The first point of entanglement is the dating of the story. While
many reviews of the film cite the 10th century, the producer
Katherine Sarafian was forthright about her approach to the temporal setting of
Brave. In a promotional video on
Pixar’s website [4], she explains that the
team chose to set the story between the 10th and the 12th
centuries. This is, to be sure, a vast time period that includes several major
shifts and events in Scottish history and culture. At the same time, this decision
to inhabit vaguely a three-century time period — while also injecting an array
of more modern details — allows for historical ambiguity and many of the
overlaps that occur in the film.
This approach is made clear in the introduction of the rival
clans. While they do arrive in ships
that bear a distinct resemblance to the birlinns (i.e., medieval Scottish
galleys), they all wear tartans, as does Merida’s father, King Fergus. The
earliest extant Scottish tartan, known as the Falkirk tartan, dates to the
third century, but the tartan we think of today — the one featured so
prominently in Brave, with its
vertical and horizontal lines — did not become popular until the 16th
century. At the same time, one of the arriving clan leaders bedecks himself in woad
paint, which harkens back to the legendary adornments of the Picts more than to
Scottish culture in the 10th-12th centuries. What is
more, we see the men briefly engage in competitive events known as the Highland
Games, and while there are historical indications that tests of strength were
in place in early medieval Scotland, these particular events (the caber toss, the
hammer throw, the weight throw, etc.) were largely a Victorian invention. While these examples are anachronistic, they
are ones that would be readily familiar to most modern audience members. These
details — the tartan, the Games, the woad paint — are probably the most easy
demarcations of ancient Scottish “identity” in modern America — perpetuated by
a variety of means, including Scottish Games and festivals and films like Braveheart (1995) and King Arthur (2004). As such, their
inclusion in Brave allows the
audience an easy and familiar cultural association, while also allowing the
film to participate in a kind of overlapping quite common in modern
medievalism.
Another example of temporal overlap occurs after the clans
are assembled. The leaders bring their sons forward and boast of their achievements
in order to make the young men seem the most desirable to Merida and her
parents. The chieftains of the Macintosh and MacGuffin clans describe their
sons defeating Viking invaders, but the Viking invasions took place in the 8th
and 9th centuries, long before the earliest part of the aforementioned
date range for the setting of Brave. Moreover,
Lord Dingwall, the third chieftain, states that his son was victorious against ten
thousand Romans, which is even more impossible given that the Romans left Scotland
in the fifth century. Some writers have used these details to attack the film’s
lack of accuracy, but I think it is equally possible to see these references as
a reflection on the characters who are giving voice to them. Taken in context,
they are merely a part of overblown speeches designed to make the boys sound
far more mature and accomplished than they actually are. It is hyperbole at its
most obvious, something at which the fathers excel from beginning to end of the
film.
While these are anachronisms of the visible but superficial
variety, Merida’s desire to choose her own destiny and her refusal to choose a
betrothed are perhaps the most significant and sustained anachronisms in the
film. As many have already observed, her obstinacy stands in stark contrast to
the ways in which young, medieval noblewomen would have perceived the same
situation. In this sense, her mother’s outrage is rather accurate and on point while
Merida’s reaction to her fate is more modern than medieval. In fairness,
however, it would have been difficult to encourage a modern audience — children
especially — to identify with medieval social behaviors, especially those that
encouraged and accepted arranged marriages out of a sense of service to one’s
realm. In fact, one could even say that reproducing those social behaviors
would have laid an entirely different set of problems at Pixar’s door, because
instead of being accused of anachronism, they could easily have found
themselves accused of encouraging subservience in their female audience. The
shift, then, is certainly forgivable because this story, even as it inhabits a
fantasized medieval landscape, is ultimately intended to be a modern one.
Compellingly, Merida is
willing to accept one of the suitors later on in the film. She marches
resolutely into the great hall where all of the clansmen are arguing and
commands the room almost as magnificently as her mother did earlier in the
film. In an attempt to buy her mother (who has been turned into a bear) time to
escape, she begins to speak to the men and tell them that she has had a change
of heart, and, rather remarkably, she comes very close to choosing one of the
boys in an attempt to right the wrongs she’s committed. Her mother, in an
equally remarkable moment, motions for her to stop before she does so, and in
the process lets her know that she too has had a change of heart. In this way,
Merida seems to come around to an understanding of her obligations not all that
removed from that of a medieval noblewoman, while her mother ultimately adopts
the strikingly modern approach to her daughter’s situation.
While these anachronisms certainly remove the film from the
realm of historical accuracy, they also allow the film to operate in a way
convergent with that of medieval romance. The
Alliterative Morte Arthur, for example, readily cherry-picks from history
and legend to create an elaborate, multi-temporal realm, and it does so in
order to weave a complex story for a contemporary, fourteenth/fifteenth-century
audience. For example, the romance has
long been noted for its strikingly faithful depiction of fourteenth-century
warfare, and yet the story it tells is one that predates even the reign of
Charlemagne. In a similar way, Brave
interweaves historical references and anachronisms in order to create a vibrant
fantasy realm — a backdrop against which it can set a story that appeals to its
contemporary audience.
Brave also shares with medieval romance a focus on
the need for a restored and strong family unit. Like romances such as Sir Isumbras and Sir Eglamour of Artois, Brave
focuses squarely on the fragility of the family and on its dissolution,
brought about in this case by Merida’s desire to avoid marriage and symbolized
by her tearing of the family tapestry lovingly woven by her mother (the gash
she leaves cuts the mother off from the rest of her family members). This
separation is literalized when Merida seeks out the help of a woodland witch,
whose potion transforms her mother into a bear, the one beast her father
loathes above all others. Merida and her mother have to flee the castle and try
to find a remedy for the curse, and they are initially faced with a cryptic
message from the witch. The spell that turned Elinor into a bear will become
permanent after the second sunrise unless Merida remembers the following words:
“Fate be changed. Look inside. Mend the bond torn by pride.” This remedy
requires them not only to strengthen their relationship and come to an
understanding of one another, but also requires Merida to literally and
figuratively stitch the family tapestry back together. This blending of the
literal and the figurative is a vital component of many of the romances I
listed previously, and while it’s unlikely that the producers had the structure
of these romances — or any medieval romance — specifically in mind as they
created Brave, I offer that these
comparisons reveal a common impulse between modern and medieval narrative: to
repurpose the past in ways that suit present narrative desires and the stories
we want and need to hear. What is more, Brave
could very well be a wonderful way to introduce students to the narrative
force and structure of medieval romance for these very reasons.
This is not to say, however, that Brave mimics the narrative structures of medieval romance
completely. One way in which it departs from (or even rewrites) the medieval
romance tradition, in fact, lies in its focus on a mother and a daughter.
Stories of fathers and daughters and mothers and sons abound in medieval
literature, but few narratives survive from the Middle Ages that focus on the
positive relationships between mothers and daughters. In fact, when mothers
appear they often are the greatest enemies of their daughters or, more
frequently, daughters-in-laws, as seen in the Constance tradition. In this
sense, Brave’s version of medieval
romance is a decidedly modern one.
Why then choose to set this film in the Middle Ages, when
its characters and the themes it emphasizes are so decidedly modern? The answer
lies, in part, in the creative spirit of the team at Pixar, who have expressed in
a variety of interviews their fascination with medieval Scotland and its
folklore. The other part, perhaps, lies in the moralizing weight of the
folktale tradition and the quasi-historical past. Setting Brave in distant, medieval Scotland, allows for a sense of
constructed authority. Just as Merida ultimately sees herself and her own
circumstances as virtually identical to that of Mor’du, so too are audiences —
children most of all — invited to consider their own relationships with their
parents in light of the (fictively ancient) story they are seeing on the
screen. Like so many films before it, Brave
positions its narrative in the “once upon a time” landscape of a fantasized
Middle Ages, and for this reason the criticism the film has received for its anachronisms
seems a bit puzzling at first. The reason, perhaps, lies in the fact that the
film straddles the real and the fantastical more so than others in the genre.
Unlike Sleeping Beauty or the Shrek films (which also position
themselves in a distant, “medieval” past), Brave
specifically identifies its characters not only as medieval but as
Scottish, and as such the film pulls towards the historical even as it remains
a folktale for a modern audience. Brave ultimately interweaves a wide
variety of historical and legendary references into its fantasy landscape. In
so doing, it reminds us of the fluid boundary between history and fantasy, how
easily the two can elide one another for the sake of good story telling.
Leila K. Norako
Notre Dame de Namur University
[3] See, for example, the
following blog articles from Made of Wynn
(http://madeofwynn.net/2012/07/09/a-medievalists-review-of-brave/), Medieval Reader (http://medievalreader.wordpress.com/2013/01/19/917/),
and Things Medieval (http://thingsmedieval.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/brave-a-medievalists-take/).